AlmaLinux
Enterprise-grade Linux built for stability, security, and long-term reliability.
Enterprise-grade Linux built for stability, security, and long-term reliability.
Choosing a Linux distribution is one of the first decisions you'll make when deploying a new server. Two of the most popular options for business environments are AlmaLinux and Ubuntu Server.
Both are capable, secure, and well-supported Linux distributions. Both can run websites, databases, business applications, virtual machines, and hosting platforms. But they come from different parts of the Linux ecosystem and are often better suited to different types of environments.
At AcuNett, we've been administering Linux servers for more than 25 years. Over that time, we've worked through multiple generations of Linux distributions and watched the server ecosystem evolve considerably. One thing hasn't changed: there is rarely a single Linux distribution that's best for every business.
The right choice depends on what you're running, which software you need to support, how your administrators work, and how you plan to maintain the server over its lifetime.
Let's take a closer look at AlmaLinux and Ubuntu Server and where each one fits.
AlmaLinux is an enterprise-focused Linux distribution designed to be compatible with the Red Hat Enterprise Linux ecosystem.
It emerged following Red Hat's decision to change the direction of CentOS Linux. For many years, CentOS was extremely popular among web hosting companies, server administrators, and businesses that wanted a stable enterprise Linux platform without the licensing costs associated with Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
AlmaLinux was created to provide a community-driven continuation of that type of enterprise Linux environment.
Today, AlmaLinux is widely used for:
For organizations coming from CentOS or another RHEL-based environment, AlmaLinux provides a familiar administrative experience.
Ubuntu Server is the server edition of Ubuntu, a Debian-based Linux distribution developed and maintained by Canonical.
Ubuntu has become one of the most widely recognized Linux distributions and is particularly popular in cloud computing, development, containerized applications, and modern infrastructure environments.
Ubuntu Server is commonly used for:
Canonical releases Long Term Support versions of Ubuntu that are specifically useful for businesses that want a stable platform with a predictable support lifecycle.
One of the biggest differences between AlmaLinux and Ubuntu is their lineage.
AlmaLinux belongs to the Red Hat family of Linux distributions, while Ubuntu is based on Debian.
This affects many of the tools and conventions administrators use to manage the server.
For example, AlmaLinux generally uses RPM packages and the DNF package manager. Ubuntu uses DEB packages and APT.
An administrator might install software on AlmaLinux using:
dnf install package-name
While on Ubuntu, the equivalent would typically be:
apt install package-name
There are also differences in default configurations, package names, filesystem conventions, networking tools, firewall implementations, and security frameworks.
For an experienced Linux administrator, these differences are manageable. For an internal IT team that already has extensive experience with one ecosystem, however, familiarity can be a legitimate reason to stay within that family.
One area where AlmaLinux is particularly strong is traditional web hosting.
The Red Hat and CentOS ecosystem has been deeply connected to commercial web hosting for decades. Many hosting tools and control panels were originally developed around these distributions.
AlmaLinux is therefore a common choice for servers running:
If we're deploying a traditional cPanel hosting environment, AlmaLinux is often one of the first distributions we consider.
Its compatibility with the broader enterprise Linux ecosystem also makes it familiar to administrators who spent years managing CentOS servers.
Ubuntu has developed a particularly strong presence in public cloud infrastructure.
It is readily available from major cloud and virtualization providers and is widely used by development teams building modern web applications.
Ubuntu can be a strong choice for environments involving:
Its popularity also means there is extensive documentation and a large community around deploying common software on Ubuntu.
Package management is one of the most noticeable day-to-day differences between the two distributions.
AlmaLinux uses the RPM package format and DNF for package management. Ubuntu uses Debian packages with APT.
Both systems handle the same fundamental responsibilities:
Neither approach is inherently better for most businesses. Administrator experience and application requirements are usually more important than the package manager itself.
If your team already maintains dozens of RHEL-based systems, adding AlmaLinux may simplify administration. If your infrastructure is primarily Debian or Ubuntu based, Ubuntu Server may make more sense.
Both AlmaLinux and Ubuntu have access to large software repositories, but package availability and versions can differ.
Enterprise-oriented distributions often prioritize stability and compatibility over providing the newest possible version of every software package.
That's generally a good thing on production servers.
A server isn't a desktop computer where having the newest application features is always desirable. Production environments benefit from predictable behavior and carefully maintained software.
Before choosing a distribution, we recommend checking the requirements of the applications that will actually run on the server.
If an application vendor officially supports a specific distribution or version, that requirement should carry significantly more weight than a general preference for one Linux distribution over another.
Both AlmaLinux and Ubuntu Server can provide secure production environments when they're properly configured and maintained.
The distribution itself is only one component of server security.
In practice, security depends heavily on how the server is administered, including:
AlmaLinux environments commonly use SELinux as an additional security layer.
Ubuntu commonly uses AppArmor for application-level access controls.
Both technologies can provide valuable protection when correctly configured.
From our perspective as Linux administrators, choosing a security-capable distribution is important, but maintaining the server correctly after deployment matters considerably more.
Businesses should pay close attention to the support lifecycle of any operating system they deploy.
Production servers often remain in service for years. Choosing a distribution with a long and predictable maintenance lifecycle reduces the frequency of major operating system migrations.
AlmaLinux is designed around the long lifecycle associated with enterprise Linux releases.
Ubuntu offers Long Term Support releases specifically intended for environments that value extended maintenance and stability.
For production infrastructure, we generally recommend using supported long-term releases rather than short-lived versions that require frequent major upgrades.
Regardless of the distribution, businesses should track end-of-life dates and begin planning upgrades well before security support ends.
If you're planning to run a hosting control panel, software compatibility may make the operating system decision for you.
Control panels support specific operating systems and versions, and those requirements change over time.
Platforms such as:
may support different combinations of AlmaLinux and Ubuntu.
Before deploying a server, always verify the current system requirements for the control panel and any related software you plan to install.
We don't recommend selecting an operating system first and then assuming every application will work with it. Start with the complete technology stack and choose an operating system that's officially supported by the software you depend on.
We frequently see questions about which Linux distribution is faster.
For most business workloads, there isn't a useful universal answer.
Server performance depends on many factors beyond the distribution, including:
A properly configured Ubuntu server can outperform a poorly configured AlmaLinux server, and the reverse is equally true.
For most organizations, we wouldn't choose between these distributions based on theoretical performance differences. Application compatibility, administration, support lifecycle, and infrastructure requirements are much more meaningful factors.
AlmaLinux may be the better fit when:
Ubuntu Server may be the better fit when:
AlmaLinux and Ubuntu aren't your only choices.
Rocky Linux is another enterprise Linux distribution commonly considered by organizations looking for a RHEL-compatible environment.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux itself remains an important option for organizations that want the commercial support, certifications, and ecosystem provided directly by Red Hat.
Debian is another excellent server operating system and forms the foundation upon which Ubuntu is built.
The Linux ecosystem provides businesses with several strong choices. That's one of Linux's advantages, but it also makes understanding your requirements before deployment more important.
It's easy to search for the "best Linux server operating system" and choose whichever distribution appears most frequently in recommendations.
We recommend taking a different approach.
Before choosing an operating system, answer these questions:
Once those questions are answered, the right distribution is often much easier to identify.
For traditional hosting environments and organizations already invested in the Red Hat ecosystem, AlmaLinux is an excellent choice. It provides a stable enterprise-oriented platform and is particularly well suited to many cPanel and web hosting environments.
For cloud infrastructure, modern application development, containerized workloads, and teams already familiar with Debian-based systems, Ubuntu Server is equally compelling.
We regularly work with different Linux distributions because the operating system should fit the workload, not the other way around.
The more important question isn't simply whether you choose AlmaLinux or Ubuntu. It's whether the server is properly designed, secured, monitored, backed up, updated, and maintained after it's deployed.
At AcuNett, Linux server administration has been our primary focus for more than 25 years. We've managed Linux infrastructure through generations of operating systems, from the earlier days of Red Hat and CentOS to today's AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, Ubuntu, Debian, and RHEL environments.
Our Linux administrators can help you choose the right operating system for a new server, migrate an existing environment, harden and optimize your server, configure monitoring and backups, and provide ongoing administration after deployment.
Whether AlmaLinux, Ubuntu, or another Linux distribution is the right choice depends on what you're trying to accomplish. Our job is to help make sure the infrastructure underneath it is reliable, secure, and properly managed.
One of the first decisions when deploying a new Linux server is choosing which Linux distribution to run.
AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, Ubuntu, Debian, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux can all provide stable, secure server environments. But they aren't identical, and the best choice depends on what the server needs to do, which applications it will run, how it will be managed, and how long you expect the environment to remain in production.
At AcuNett, we've been administering Linux servers for more than 25 years. Over that time, we've worked with many distributions and watched the Linux hosting landscape evolve considerably.
One thing has remained consistent: the right Linux distribution is the one that fits the workload and can be maintained properly over the life of the server.
Linux itself is the operating system kernel, but a complete server operating system includes much more than the kernel.
A Linux distribution packages the kernel together with components such as:
Different distributions make different decisions about how those components are packaged, maintained, updated, and supported.
That's why two Linux servers can both be running Linux while providing noticeably different administrative experiences.
There are many Linux distributions available, but business servers tend to concentrate around several major platforms.
For most production environments we encounter, the conversation usually includes:
Each has strengths and situations where it makes particularly good sense.
AlmaLinux is an enterprise-focused Linux distribution designed to be compatible with the Red Hat Enterprise Linux ecosystem.
It became particularly important in the hosting industry following changes to CentOS, providing organizations with a familiar path for servers that had traditionally relied on the CentOS and RHEL ecosystem.
AlmaLinux is commonly used for:
For businesses familiar with CentOS or RHEL-based systems, AlmaLinux generally provides a very familiar administrative environment.
AlmaLinux can be a strong choice when:
It has become one of the distributions we regularly encounter in modern Linux hosting environments.
Rocky Linux is another enterprise Linux distribution built around compatibility with the RHEL ecosystem.
Like AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux emerged as an important option for organizations looking for a successor to traditional CentOS Linux deployments.
Rocky Linux is suitable for many of the same workloads as AlmaLinux, including:
From an administration perspective, someone experienced with RHEL, CentOS, or AlmaLinux will generally find Rocky Linux familiar.
Businesses sometimes spend a great deal of time trying to determine which of these two distributions is technically superior.
In many real-world server environments, the differences are less important than other factors such as:
Both can be valid choices for production Linux infrastructure.
Ubuntu Server is one of the most widely used Linux server distributions and is particularly common in cloud environments.
Ubuntu is based on Debian and uses the APT package management system.
It is frequently used for:
Ubuntu's Long Term Support releases make it attractive for production environments where businesses want a predictable support lifecycle without upgrading the operating system every year.
Ubuntu can be a strong choice when:
Ubuntu also has extensive documentation and a very large user and developer community, which can make software deployment easier for many application stacks.
Debian is one of the oldest and most influential Linux distributions still in active use.
Ubuntu itself is based on Debian, so the two environments share many similarities, including APT package management and DEB software packages.
Debian has a reputation for emphasizing stability and conservative software choices.
It is commonly used for:
Debian can be a strong choice when:
Debian is often appealing to experienced Linux administrators who want a relatively clean and predictable base operating system.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux, commonly called RHEL, is a commercial enterprise Linux distribution developed by Red Hat.
It serves as the foundation for the broader ecosystem that includes AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux.
RHEL is commonly used by organizations that want:
For some businesses, particularly larger organizations and environments with formal vendor requirements, commercial support can justify the additional licensing cost.
Before choosing a distribution, determine what the server is actually going to run.
Some applications officially support only certain Linux distributions or versions.
Others may technically run on many distributions but provide documentation, installation packages, or support primarily for one ecosystem.
Before deploying a new server, review requirements for:
If a critical application officially supports Ubuntu but not AlmaLinux, that may make the choice easy.
If your control panel strongly recommends AlmaLinux, that may point in the opposite direction.
For hosting servers, control panel compatibility can be one of the most important factors when choosing a Linux distribution.
Popular control panels include:
Each control panel maintains its own list of supported operating systems.
Before installing a control panel, verify that the specific Linux distribution and version you intend to use is officially supported.
This is especially important because control panels interact deeply with the operating system. They manage web servers, DNS, email, databases, users, SSL certificates, packages, and many other services.
Running a control panel on an unsupported operating system can create significant maintenance problems later.
Linux distributions generally fall into different software packaging families.
AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, and RHEL use RPM packages and typically use DNF for package management.
Ubuntu and Debian use DEB packages and typically use APT.
For experienced Linux administrators, both systems are straightforward to manage.
However, administrator familiarity matters.
If your internal team has years of experience managing Ubuntu servers, choosing Ubuntu may simplify day-to-day operations. If your infrastructure has traditionally been based on RHEL or CentOS systems, AlmaLinux or Rocky Linux may be a more natural fit.
A production Linux server may remain online for many years.
That makes the operating system's support lifecycle extremely important.
Before deploying a server, determine:
This is particularly important for infrastructure that is difficult to migrate.
If you're building a server expected to support a business application for several years, choosing an operating system that will reach end of life shortly after deployment creates unnecessary future work.
This sounds obvious, but it happens more often than it should.
An administrator may choose a Linux version because they're familiar with it without realizing that only a short period of official support remains.
The server works perfectly when deployed, but the business soon faces another operating system migration.
Before provisioning any new production server, verify the lifecycle of the specific version rather than simply choosing the distribution name.
Businesses sometimes ask which Linux distribution is the most secure.
There isn't a useful universal answer.
All of the major server distributions can be deployed securely.
Security depends heavily on how the server is configured and maintained.
That includes:
A fully patched and well-hardened Ubuntu server can be extremely secure.
So can AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, Debian, or RHEL.
Likewise, any of them can become insecure if they're deployed and then ignored for years.
One difference businesses may encounter between distribution families is the default mandatory access control system.
RHEL-based distributions such as AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux commonly use SELinux.
Ubuntu commonly uses AppArmor.
Both provide additional security controls beyond standard Linux file permissions.
Administrators familiar with one environment may prefer continuing to use the security framework they already know, but either can provide strong protections when configured correctly.
Different Linux distributions may provide different versions of software in their standard repositories.
One distribution may prioritize stability and ship an older but thoroughly tested software version, while another may make newer packages available sooner.
This matters for workloads that depend on particular versions of:
Additional repositories and vendor packages can often provide versions outside the standard repository, but they add another layer that needs to be maintained.
Application requirements should be reviewed before selecting the operating system.
If the server will run in a public cloud, the provider may influence the decision.
Major cloud platforms generally support several Linux distributions, but particular images, integrations, management tools, or documentation may favor certain platforms.
Before deploying, consider:
The operating system should fit naturally into the environment where it will be managed.
This factor is often underestimated.
A theoretically perfect Linux distribution isn't very useful if nobody responsible for the server knows how to manage it properly.
Linux distributions share many fundamental concepts, but there are differences in:
Organizations that already have Linux administrators should consider the platforms those administrators know best.
Standardization also helps. Managing 50 servers is generally easier when they're based on a small number of known operating system configurations rather than a different distribution on every machine.
If your business operates multiple Linux servers, choosing a standard distribution can reduce administrative overhead.
Standardization can make it easier to maintain:
There will always be exceptions where a particular application requires something different, but unnecessary variation makes infrastructure harder to maintain.
Popularity can be useful because widely adopted distributions tend to have strong communities, documentation, and software support.
But popularity alone isn't a reason to deploy an operating system.
The better questions are:
If those answers are solid, you're probably looking at an appropriate platform.
People sometimes ask whether Ubuntu, AlmaLinux, Debian, or another distribution is faster.
In most normal business environments, the distribution name itself isn't the primary performance factor.
Performance is more likely to be influenced by:
There can certainly be differences between software versions, kernels, default configurations, and workloads, but there is no universal rule that one major Linux distribution will make every application faster.
We recommend choosing the platform based on compatibility and maintainability first, then properly optimizing the server for its workload.
For traditional hosting environments, AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux are common choices, particularly where the infrastructure is based around the RHEL ecosystem.
Ubuntu is also widely used for web hosting, particularly for custom hosting stacks, cloud servers, and application environments.
The hosting control panel can be a major deciding factor.
If you're building a cPanel, Plesk, DirectAdmin, or another control panel server, start by reviewing the operating systems officially supported by the current version of that platform.
For a custom web application, the development and deployment environment should play a major role.
If your developers build and test everything on Ubuntu, deploying production to Ubuntu may reduce unnecessary differences between environments.
If the application vendor certifies only RHEL-compatible systems, AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, or RHEL may make more sense.
The closer the production environment aligns with the software's supported architecture, the easier it is usually to maintain.
All of the major Linux server distributions can run popular database platforms such as MySQL, MariaDB, and PostgreSQL.
The decision should usually be based on:
Database performance is typically much more dependent on hardware, storage, memory, configuration, and workload than on choosing between two properly supported Linux distributions.
At AcuNett, we don't believe every Linux server should run the same distribution.
For many traditional hosting and control panel environments, AlmaLinux is an excellent option.
Rocky Linux can provide a similarly strong RHEL-compatible platform.
Ubuntu Server is often a natural choice for cloud infrastructure, custom applications, and development-oriented environments.
Debian provides a stable platform that many experienced Linux administrators prefer for custom server deployments.
RHEL can make sense for organizations that specifically require commercial vendor support and enterprise certifications.
The correct answer depends on the server's purpose.
Choosing Ubuntu instead of AlmaLinux is only part of the decision.
You also need to choose the appropriate release.
A supported long-term release is generally preferable for production infrastructure because it provides a predictable maintenance window.
Before deploying, verify:
Deploying the newest release simply because it is newest isn't always appropriate either. Critical software may not yet officially support it.
The best production release is usually one that is current, stable, fully supported, and compatible with the applications you intend to run.
Every operating system eventually reaches the end of its supported lifecycle.
That means the question isn't whether the server will eventually need an upgrade or migration. The question is when.
Good infrastructure planning considers that from the beginning.
Document:
When the next migration arrives several years later, that documentation can make the process considerably easier.
After more than 25 years of Linux server administration, we've seen reliable production environments built on many different Linux distributions.
We've also seen poorly maintained servers running every one of them.
The distribution provides the foundation, but long-term reliability depends on what happens afterward.
A production Linux server still needs:
Choosing a good distribution is important. Maintaining it properly is even more important.
At AcuNett, we've been administering Linux servers for more than 25 years. We work with AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, Ubuntu, Debian, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and other Linux platforms across hosting, application, database, and business infrastructure environments.
Our Linux administrators can help you choose the right operating system for a new deployment, configure and harden the server, migrate existing applications, set up monitoring and backups, troubleshoot performance problems, and provide ongoing server management.
If you're planning a new Linux server and aren't sure which distribution best fits your applications and infrastructure, AcuNett can help you evaluate the options and build an environment designed for long-term reliability and maintainability.
Stable, secure Linux trusted by administrators worldwide.
Innovative Linux platform featuring the latest open-source technologies.
Enterprise Linux designed for mission-critical workloads.
Community-driven enterprise Linux focused on long-term stability.
Popular Linux platform known for flexibility and broad compatibility.